A phytosociology survey and vegetation description of inselbergs in the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site , South Africa

http://www.koedoe.co.za doi:10.4102/koedoe.v57i1.1233 No previous scientific surveys have been conducted on inselbergs in the Drakensberg. The aim of this study was to collect specimens, identify, describe and name the vegetation clusters and assess biogeographical connections with other Afromontane regions. A total of 103 relevés where sampled from six inselbergs. The plant sampling was carried out according to the Braun-Blanquet method with the plant and environmental data entered in TURBOVEG and exported as a Cornell Condensed format file (CC!) into Juice. Classification was completed using TWINSPAN (Two-way Indicator Species Analysis) (modified), resulting in 4 major communities, 11 communities, 13 sub-communities and 18 variants. Ordination (indirect) was carried out using CANOCO (version 4.5) to investigate the relationship between species. The four major communities identified are Rhodohypoxis rubella (wetland grass and forblands), Scirpus ficinioides – Crassula peploides (sheet rock grass and forblands), Pentaschistis exserta (high-altitude alpine grassland), previously undescribed, and Merxmuellera drakensbergensis – Helichrysum trilineatum (high-altitude alpine fynbos grassland), described in other vegetation and floristic studies. Four habitats were identified, namely wetlands, sheet rock shallow soil, highaltitude alpine grassland and deep soil high-altitude fynbos grasslands. Substrate and moisture availability appeared to be the defining micro-climatic conditions determining the different vegetation clusters whilst altitude is the overriding environmental factor influencing all vegetation.


Introduction
Studies of high-altitude inselbergs within the east and southern Afromontane region are few.Whilst studies of inselbergs in Africa have been concentrated more in West Africa (Barthlott, Gröger & Porembski 1993;Parmentier et al. 2006;Porembski & Brown 1995;Porembski et al. 1996Porembski et al. , 1997;;Seine et al. 1998), several have been undertaken in Namibia (Burke 2001(Burke , 2002(Burke , 2004) ) and South Africa, such as with the Korannaberg (Du Preez 1991) and Platberg, at 2394.5 m, some 60 km north of the Drakensberg (Brand, Du Preez & Brown 2010).Other inselberg surveys have been conducted in Moçambique (Van Noort, Gardiner & Tolley 2007) which document the high biological diversity and establishe inselbergs as sites of high endemism.Many are denoted as biodiversity 'hotspots' (Van Noort et al. 2007), which also represent relictual plant populations of past climate conditions.Climate change and global warming, with its rising carbon dioxide levels, will have a profound impact on the grassland biome and the structure of C 3 and C 4 grasses (Mucina & Rutherford 2006), in particular the alpine grasses embedded in the grassland biome.Inselbergs have also been assessed for their high conservation value and biotic diversity (ed.Huntley 1989).This article is the first phytosociological survey of the high-altitude inselbergs in the Drakensberg.Its aims are to (1) classify the inselberg alpine vegetation into communities and present the species composition, (2) examine environmental gradients to identify habitats and (3) identify and examine biogeographical affinities with previously described or identified http://www.koedoe.co.za doi:10.4102/koedoe.v57i1.1233 plant communities.This new knowledge will contribute to the understanding and conservation management of high-altitude alpine vegetation and species unique to the Drakensberg.

Study area
The study sites are located in the Drakensberg, South Africa, and consist of six inselbergs, all over 3000 m in altitude (Figure 1).The most northerly, Sentinel, is located at 28°44'25.97"S and 28°53'27.42"E, with four inselbergs -Eastern Buttress, Inner Horn, Outer Horn and Dragon's Back -sequentially between it and the most southerly of the inselbergs surveyed, namely Cathkin Peak at 29°4'35.03" S and 29°20'59.38"E. All six peaks fall within the KwaZulu-Natal uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park, a World Heritage site and part of the Drakensberg Alpine Centre (DAC) biodiversity hotspot.All inselbergs with the exception of Sentinel are relatively flat-topped, with boulders, shallow soils occurring on sheet rock, gravel plains, seeps, interconnected seasonally inundated wetlands and ephemeral pools (Figures 2 and 3).They are all sheer sided, separated by varying distances from the main escarpment by cliffs of 1000 m or more, and form an archipelago of island-like peaks stretching some 60 km north to south.

Data collection
A total of 103 plots where sampled on the six inselbergs.Plot sizes varied according to substrate, and were subjectively estimated at either 3 m x 3 m for sheet rock, seeps or gravel plains, or 6 m x 5 m for grass or dwarf shrub vegetation as per theoretical criteria (Westhoff & Van der Maarel 1980) and established field practice in South Africa (Brown et al. 2013).In all sample plots each species was recorded, all plants counted and cover estimated using the modified Braun-Blanquet cover/abundance scale: r, +, 1, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5 (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974;Whitaker 1980) (Tichý & Holt 2006).

Data processing
A first approximation at clustering was carried out using the TWINSPAN (Two-way Indicator Species Analysis) algorithm of Hill (1979) which is incorporated as part of the Juice program.To produce the syntaxonomic table using Juice, separators were defined at six hierarchical levels, with group size standardised.Using Juice version 7.0.28(Tichý & Holt 2006), the diagnostic species were identified by applying a statistical fidelity measurement which is useful for assessment of species concentration in vegetation units, and for comparing diagnostic values amongst species in a particular vegetation unit, or amongst vegetation units for a particular species (Tichý & Holt 2006).Fidelity values were calculated using the phi coefficient, which considers only presence/absence data, so that the fidelity values are not influenced by the cover/abundance values of the species (Lepš & Hadincová 1992).The Fisher's exact test was employed along with the phi coefficient fidelity measure to calculate the true probability of obtaining the observed number of occurrences of the species in the vegetation unit under the null hypothesis of independence.Using the Fisher's exact test along with the phi coefficient measure of fidelity causes values that are not statistically significant  of non-numerical scores 'r' and '+', which pose computation problems discussed in detail by Podani (2006), this method of field data collection was used to conform with and make this survey's data compatible with the thousands of relevés already sampled in South Africa.The continued use of the Braun-Blanquet method in South Africa is also suggested by Brown et al. (2013).

Classification
Within Juice the lower threshold values for the diagnostic, constant and dominant species when applying the 'Analysis of columns of syntaxonomic tables' (Tichý & Holt 2006) function were set to 70, 60 and 50 respectively, whilst the upper threshold values were set to 80, 70 and 60 respectively.Species that exceed the lower threshold are listed whilst those that exceed the upper threshold are printed in bold.

Naming of plant communities
The naming of plant communities was carried out according to guidelines suggested by Brown et al. (2013).
The syntaxonomic names for the major communities, communities, sub-communities and variants were derived according to diagnostic, dominant and constant species obtained from floristic and environmental data processed in Juice (Tichý & Holt 2006).

Gradient analysis
The skewness and kurtosis calculations performed with PC-ORD version 5.0 revealed the non-unimodal distribution of the species data (also confirmed by the disjunct nature of the dataset as indicated by the DCA eigenvalue of one for the first axis) (Gauch 1982a(Gauch , 1982b)).To achieve a normal distribution the species data were log-transformed during ordination (Legendre & Legendre 1998).
A final manipulation of relevé columns and species rows was carried out in Juice to fine-tune the phytosociological table, which was exported into Excel and refined for presentation by moving rows containing species and adding alphabetic letters to denote species groups (Online Appendix 1).Groups of similar ecological characteristics were identified and related to environmental gradients.The relationship of the identified plant communities with the environmental variables is presented in Figures 4 and 5.

Species composition
A total of 103 relevés and 189 species where incorporated in the classification; 2.6% of these were Pteridophytes, 31% were Monocotyledons and 66% were Dicotyledons.
There are 79 species that occur in ≥ 4 relevés and which do not form appreciable clusters, and have been left out of the formal phytosociological description.However, all species are included in Online Appendix 1.The average number of species per plot is 14.16 (s.d.6.56), minimum 4, maximum 32.There are seven sub-communities and variants with the same numbers of relevés, diagnostic, constant and dominant species.Accordingly, only the sub-communities have been described and named whilst ignoring the variants.There are 18 variants which have different diagnostic, constant and dominant species, which have been named.Subsequently, there are 13 unique subcommunities, 18 variants, 11 communities and four major communities which form the syntaxonomical classification presented in Online Appendix 1.

Gradient analysis
TWINSPAN produced four major communities representative of four different habitats (Figures 4 and 5).These are: • Major community 1: Wetland grass and forblands.
Figure 4 shows outliers representing 11 relevés, all of which comprise major community 1, wetlands.Relevés 94, 91, 92 and 90 have the highest values and form major community 3, which is the wettest of all habitats and is comprised of obligate wetland species: Aster erucifolius, Crassula dependens, Crassula gemmifera, Limosella grandiflora, Limosella vesiculosa, Pentaschistis airoides and Rhodohypoxis rubella (Online Appendix 1), which includes Aponogeton junceus found in deep, water-filled pools.Relevés 101, 102 and 103 represent major community 2, a mix of forbs favouring moist, shallow, wet rock or gravel areas, whilst relevés 97, 98, 99 and 100, which constitute major community 1, have the dominant grass Pentaschistis airoides and the wetland forb Limosella vesiculosa, which is found in ephemeral or temporary wetlands and can withstand desiccation, high salinity and alkalinity and extreme temperatures of freezing and thawing (Heilmeier et al. 2005).Major community 1 ephemeral wetlands possibly dry up during June, July and August, the 3 driest months in the alpine region of the Drakensberg (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).Major community 1 wetlands represent a gradation of wetland habitats, from deep pools (community 1; species group B, Online Appendix 1) to seasonal, shallow rocky seeps (community 2; species group C, Online Appendix 1) to semipermanent or ephemeral pools (community 3; species group D, Online Appendix 1).Limosella grandiflora (species group D, Online Appendix 1) is an angiosperm, poikilohydric plant indicative of vernal or ephemeral pools (Figure 3), similar to inselbergs in Namibia and Zimbabwe (Heilmeier et al. 2005;Mokuku 1991) and described by Hillard and Burtt (1987) in the northern Drakensberg.
In Figure 4, the tight clustering of relevés 79-61 constitutes major community 2, and forms a decreasing gradient overlaid by relevés 81 through 96 to 61.The habitat of sheet rock shallow soils is confirmed by the dominant species Scirpus ficinioides, a facultative wetland species (Marneweck & Kotze 1999), and the diagnostic species Crassula peploides.Grasses forming major community 2 are the two facultative wetland species Festuca caprina and Koeleria capensis (Marneweck & Kotze 1999).Additionally, within major community 2, the three grasses favouring seeps or seasonally inundated wetland habitats are Pentaschistis exserta, Polevansia rigida and Styppeiochloa gynoglossa (Gibbs-Russell et al. 1991).These sheet rock shallow soil habitats are found on all inselbergs, as shown in Figures 4 and 5, where group 2 represents major community 2, group 3 represents major community 3 (high-altitude alpine grasses) and group 4 represents major community 4 (high-altitude fynbos grasslands).
The results from Figures 4 and 5 show habitat and plant affinities associated throughout the six inselbergs whilst also showing separation into discrete clusters centred on each inselberg.

Describing the plant communities
All clusters are named in the Discussion and fully listed in the Online Appendix 1.
Major community 1, Rhodohypoxis rubella (wetland grass and forblands), which consists of 11 relevés, contains nine species (five monocots, four dicots) of which eight are endemic or near-endemic, high-latitude Afromontane/ DAC species with Rhodohypoxis rubella the diagnostic species (75.8% abundance) as well as providing 100% constancy.It is comprised of three communities.Community 1 has the diagnostic species Limosella vesiculosa (100%) and the constant species Pentaschistis airoides and Rhodohypoxis rubella.Community 2 has no diagnostic species whilst constant species are Aster erucifolius, Crassula dependens (the only non-endemic DAC taxon), Rhodohypoxis rubella and the shrub Clutia nana (67% constancy).Community 3 has the diagnostic species Aponogeton junceus (86.2%) and Limosella grandiflora (80.9%), with constant species Aponogeton junceus and Crassula gemmifera (75%) and Limosella grandiflora and Rhodohypoxis rubella (100%).All species provide limited cover/abundance with the shallow, seasonally inundated wetlands on gravel or sheet rock outcrop substrate.Major community 2, Scirpus ficinioides -Crassula peploides (sheet rock grass and forblands) is comprised of two communities, five sub-communities and eight variants.This major community has limited cover/abundance from all species with the diagnostic species Crassula peploides present in 54% of 28 relevés.The vegetation is comprised of 61% monocots (18 species) and 13 dicots of which 3 are Crassulaceae (Online Appendix 1).The sedge Scirpus ficinioides is the dominant species.The two communities are community 2.1 (22 relevés) with Scirpus ficinioides the dominant species (71% presence), and community 2.2 (5 relevés) which has no dominant species.The diagnostic species is Ficinia cinnamomea (88.8% presence), with constant species Clutia nana, Felicia linearis, and Oxalis obliquifolia.Species composition and habitat may suggest that major community 2 represents a gradient of vegetation types in transition between wetland habitat (major community 1) and alpine grassland (major community 3).
The last community to the right on the syntaxonomic table (Online Appendix 1), community 4.3, Merxmuellera drakensbergensis -Schoenoxiphium schweickerdtii (alpine grassland), is dominated by the tall, rhizomatous, endemic grass Merxmuellera drakensbergensis with 100% constancy and cover/abundance of 30% -> 70% of relevés.It is so dominant that it has almost totally excluded all other alpine grasses, fynbos families, for example Ericaceae, and the tall fynbos shrubs, for example Passerina, Cliffortia, Euryops and Helichrysum trilineatum.This could be a combination of two factors; it is found on deep soil and is a large, tufted grass which would out-compete smaller species.Some plants were found to be present throughout many of the relevés in major community 4, but with limited cover/ abundance.They include six forbs, namely Othonna burttii, Scabiosa columbaria, Craterocapsa tarsodes, Helichrysum infaustum, Helichrysum bellidiastrum and Alepidea pusilla.Other widespread forbs occurring with limited cover/ abundance found in major communities 2, 3 and 4 include Rhodohypoxis baurii (absent from major community 1), Psammotropha obtusa and Oxalis obliquifolia.The facultative wetland species Rhodohypoxis rubella, which dominates and defines major community 1, also occurs scattered throughout other relevés in major communities 2 and 4.
Major community 1 only has a single diagnostic species, Rhodohypoxis rubella, with constancy of 75 and no dominant species.There are no other species which occur with >± 50% dominance or constancy (Online Appendix 1), thus a single species is used to name it.
The wetland vegetation consists of 11 relevés with nine species of which only Pentaschistis airoides occurs with any significant presence.It constitutes largely aquatic forbs and contributes 10% to the total vegetation surveyed.The highaltitude bogs, mires and peatlands described by Killick (1963Killick ( , 1978aKillick ( , 1978bKillick ( , 1990)), Hillard and Burtt (1987) and Hill (1996) and found on the escarpment top in Lesotho and the Mont-aux-Source/Tugela Falls area show floristic affinities with major community 1, Rhodohypoxis rubella (wetland) and to a lesser extent major community 2, Scirpus ficinioides -Polevansia rigida (alpine grassland).Aquatic taxa include Aponogeton, Crassula, Limosella and Rhodohypoxis on wet gravel plains and seeps.
Major community 2, Crassula peploides -Polevansia ridida (sheet rock grass and forblands), occurring on gravel seeps, has limited cover/abundance of most species and, after major community 1, is lowest in species richness and contributes 39% of the total relevés.The shallow soils, gravel plains and sheet rock would appear to be the limiting factor responsible for the low growth form and limited species numbers and presence.The scattered, open nature vegetation is problematic in naming major community 2. Polevansia rigida was selected as the primary name as it had the highest cover/abundance and constancy out of all other species for all 28 relevés (Online Appendix 1).Monocots comprise 61% of the diagnostic, constant and dominant species for major community 2, constituted by 31 species, 18 are monocots and 13 are dicots of which 3 are Crassulaceae.No carnivorous plants were found, unlike at Platberg, where Urticaceae and Droseraceae species formed distinct communities (Brand, Du Preez & Brown 2013).Carnivorous plants from both these families are reported to be significant components of shallow soil and ephemeral flush vegetation communities occurring on inselbergs in the Ivory Coast (Porembski & Barthlott 1997).
Major community 4, Merxmuellera drakensbergensis -Helichrysum trilineatum (high-altitude alpine fynbos grassland) represents the vegetation common to and found on all inselbergs.The dominant plants are alpine C 3 grasses combined with Helichrysum trilineatum, fynbos shrubs and the genus Erica which form heathlands. Major community 4 has species and physiognomic affinities with the uKhahlamba Basalt Grassland and the Drakensberg Afroalpine Heathland (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).This cluster shares affinities with the lower-altitude Drakensberg-Amathole Afromontane Fynbos and the Lesotho Highlands Basalt Grassland (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).(Körner 2003;Tieszen et al. 1979).This same physiognomic, large-tussock grass is exhibited by another C 4 grass, Andropogon amethystinus, which forms large tussocks, found on the Aberdares and Mt.Kenya above 3000 m, and which has the same growth characteristic as Eragrostis caesia (Tieszen et al. 1979).
Plant physiological adaptation to alpine conditions can be seen in the large tufted grasses  (Hedberg 1964;Körner 2003;Masao et al. 2013).
The high-altitude wetland community dominated by sedges and described by Hill (1996) has affinities with major communities 3 and 4. The common sedges are Scirpus ficinioides and Schoenoxiphium filiforme.Two dominant grasses of Hill's high-altitude wetland community are Merxmuellera drakensbergensis and Pentaschistis oreodoxa, not found in the inselberg wetlands, but components of major community 4.
From Hill's (1996) description of the high-altitude wetland community, it shows more species and vegetation affinities with major community 4, the alpine grasslands, than with wetlands on the inselbergs.
Of all regions in the Drakensberg, the inselbergs may be regarded as showing no anthropogenic influence from grazing, ploughing or fire, which does occur but is lighting induced.There is limited human presence: climbers have built cairns on most of the peaks, there are log books on Sentinel and Cathkin Peak, a bovine skull -probably a cow placed as vulture food -and the metal top of a smoke grenade was found on Cathkin, and tourists visit Inner and Outer Horn via helicopter; however, human impact is negligible, unlike the heavily impacted, overgrazed, hoof-eroded adjacent escarpment in Lesotho.

Syntaxonomical classification
Despite the broad treatment of the southern Africa vegetation by Mucina and Rutherford (2006), large parts of South Africa still remain to be surveyed in detail using phytosociological methods.There is still much work to be done before South Africa reaches the level of vegetation analysis, classification and description which currently exists in Europe.Consequently, the syntaxonomical plant associations presented use the standard system in current use in South Africa (Brown et al. 2013), that is, community, subcommunity and variant, which are analogous with alliance, association and sub-association, the original designations used by Braun-Blanquet (1964), and discussed by Westhoff and Van der Maarel (1980).
This article does not attempt to place the plant communities into a formal syntaxonomical classification of the established hierarchy of nomenclature and existing abstract categorisations of the European Zurich-Montpellier system (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974;Weber, Moravec & Theurillat 2000).This survey encompasses 103 relevés, sampled on six inselbergs with a combined surface area of only 31.9 ha.It is felt that this survey does not give sufficient representation to cover the vegetation of the extensive alpine region of the Drakensberg.It would be appropriate for a larger-scale survey, which incorporates plots on the Escarpment adjacent as well as further north and south of the inselbergs, to be conducted.This would provide sufficient data to assign formal syntaxonomic ranks and names to the floristic clusters.The descriptions presented in this survey should be considered as a starting point.

Conservation and climate change
Papers on inselbergs in the Free State (Brand et al. 2010;Du Preez 1991) have provided suggestions to assist decision-makers to design policies and provide protection for vegetation, relict plant populations and endemic taxa found only on inselbergs.(Forster 2007) to further protect the high mountains and their peaks (Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife 2011).As the first survey of these inselbergs, this article can make a contribution to the practical application of the KZN Protected Areas Management Plan.
Rising carbon dioxide levels with the concomitant increase in temperature will affect the composition and structure of alpine plant communities (Körner 2003), and particularly grasses which use the C 3 metabolic pathway, which are the most vulnerable to increase in temperature.The predicted effects are a drastic decrease in C 3 grasses, as well as a decrease in the Drakensberg alpine vegetation in both area and number of vegetation units (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).The alpine vegetation is embedded in the grassland biome and is defined as high-altitude Drakensberg grassland, a subdivision of the grassland biome (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).A detailed phytosociological map has not been made of the vegetation above 2900 m.Predictions are thus broad based and are extrapolations, which suggest an increase in woody components and a decrease in numbers of frost days and rainfall (Mucina & Rutherford 2006).Peters (1992) predicted that a 3 °C increase in global temperature would be equivalent to a 500 m upward shift in altitudinal zones.The threat posed by global warming to the world's alpine regions, including the Drakensberg, will cause a significant reduction in the distribution of plants, and change their structure and composition, forcing some taxa to higher altitudes (Taylor 1996), whilst those DAC endemics and C 3 grasses already found at altitude will face the threat of total loss of habitat.For inselbergs -such as Platberg, which at its highest point is 2394.4m, below the critical altitude of 2500 m (Taylor 1996) -the loss of the taxa could be potentially catastrophic.

Conclusion
This article is a first attempt at a phytosociological analysis and vegetation description of high-altitude alpine plant communities in the Drakensberg, which, using ordination methods, identified four different habitats.It is unknown how species numbers and cover in these habitats may change seasonally as a result of decrease in rainfall during the drier season.The overriding ecological factor is prolonged freezing, the effect of high altitude, followed by high rainfall and, undoubtedly, soil composition and its depth, which play an important part in lower amplitude ecological factors responsible for species richness and diversity.This also confirms within community plant affinities as well as the broader landscape level vegetation clustering.
Legislation is in place to protect the inselbergs on the Drakensberg Escarpment as the Free State Province is in the process of drafting a provincial biodiversity strategy to specifically protect inselbergs.

Source:FIGURE 1 :
FIGURE 1: Maps of study sites: (a) study area with KwaZulu-Natal uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park (shaded) and (b) South Africa indicating Drakensberg Alpine Centre.

FIGURE 2 :
FIGURE 2: Photographs of inselberg vegetation in the Drakensberg: (a) typical inselberg vegetation of low, cushion-forming fynbos shrubs and bunch grass on Outer Buttress, with the sloping peak of Sentinel in the background, (b) the flat top of Inner Buttress showing three of the four habitats: sheet rock outcrops/gravel plains, alpine grasslands and deep soil, Helichrysum/Erica fynbos grassland.Devils tooth in the foreground, (c) tall, montane grass community: Merxmuellera drakensbergensis, Erica dominans and the yellow-flowering Moraea alticola, (d) deep soil habitat of the yellow-flowering Helichrysum trilineatum, Erica species and Passerina drakensbergensis with typical caespitose habitat, indicative of alpine conditions, (e) Wetland habitat, with Aponogeton ranunculiflorus the Drakensberg Alpine Centre endemic, hydrophyte, an ephemeral-pool specialistn and (f) mixed habitats on Cathkin of wetlands, gravel seeps, sheet rock shallow soils, embedded in rocky terrain with alpine grasslands and the Helichrysum/Erica fynbos.

FIGURE 5 :-
FIGURE 5: Correspondence analysis with wetlands (Group 1) removed to show more clearly the gradients typifying Groups 2, 3 and 4.

Community 4. 1 ,
Scirpus falsus -Anthospermum basuticum (fynbos shrubland), has the sedge Scirpus falsus as the dominant species and the DAC-endemic shrub Anthospermum basuticum as the defining species.It has two sub-communities: sub-community 4.1.1,Macowania glandulosa -Disa crassicornis (fynbos shrubland) and sub-community 4.1.2,Scirpus falsus -Anthospermum basuticum, which is defined by a high cover/ abundance of the common sedge Scirpus falsus and has a lack of a unique species clustering.
Mucina and Rutherford (2006)and whichMucina and Rutherford (2006)state defines the core of the DAC of Endemism.Of the 16 grass species (from nine genera), all are C 3 except for Polevansia rigida, the only mat-forming, stoloniferous, rhizomatous grass, and Eragrostis caesia.The presence of Eragrostis caesia, which is a short to medium height (450 mm -600 mm) densely tufted grass, unlike other Eragrostis species, may be explained by the same temperature protection -thermal microclimate created by dense or large tussock growth form of Merxmuellera drakensbergensis and Merxmuellera stricta As part of the biodiversity plan for Free State, the Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs (DETEA) has started the process of identifying inselbergs and making suggestions on a provincial scale to best manage and protect them (N.Collins [DETEA], pers.comm., 03 May 2012).In KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), which shares a common provincial boundary with the Free State, the protection of inselbergs is assured as part of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site Management Plan (Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife 2011).The management plan also stipulates on-going research to fill gaps in ecosystem function and reduce the risk of making incorrect management decisions.All World Heritage Sites require a protected area management plan as defined in Article 1 of the World Heritage Convention Act (No. 49 of 1999) (see https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/legislations/world_heritage_conventionact49.pdf), and which is incorporated in South African national legislation to protect biodiversity.KZN is also in the process of developing its Buffer Policy