Essay

Taking stock after a decade: Does the ‘thresholds of potential concern’ concept need a socio-ecological revamp?

Harry Biggs, Sam Ferreira, Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson, Rina Grant-Biggs
Koedoe | Vol 53, No 2 | a1002 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1002 | © 2011 Harry Biggs, Sam Ferreira, Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson, Rina Grant-Biggs | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 May 2010 | Published: 11 May 2011

About the author(s)

Harry Biggs, Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa
Sam Ferreira, Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa
Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson, Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa
Rina Grant-Biggs, Scientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa

Abstract

The concept of thresholds of potential concern (TPCs) as implemented for the last decade in strategic adaptive management in South African National Parks (SANParks), has proved workable in practice in a number of instances, but in others appears beset by conceptual and practical limitations or barriers. Three common challenges relate to (1) situations where there is uncertainty about whether and where real thresholds exist, (2) whether and how preferences and other social constructs, as opposed to what were seen as objective biophysical variables only, can be used for TPCs and (3) whether it is admissible to adjust TPCs to allow for variations in societal behaviour, in particular rate of management response. All three challenges arise in the face of TPC objectivity implied by the original definition, and in the light of the original view that TPCs be set some distance prior to a presumed ecological threshold.

This paper suggests that the three challenges can be partly or largely dealt with by the use of a wider socio-ecological view, rather than seeing TPCs in isolation or as being only biophysical. Also, while detection of abrupt changes is helpful, it makes little practical difference if some TPCs happen to describe linear processes. The very decision to intervene can induce an abrupt change. Once a wider socio-ecological approach is employed, it becomes necessary for the user to specify the particular usage envisaged for the TPC, for instance, whether it is considered a preference and whether that preference is believed in any way to be related to an ecological threshold. In all cases, it is recommended that some form of explicit representation of the socio- ecological view is constructed – we suggest a cause-and-effect diagram (and give an example generated through a thought experiment) which describes presumed relationships in the subsystem of interest. This provides a broader systemic context and a shared understanding, and has implications for considering scenarios and management alternatives. For practical reasons, from the several states and processes in such a subsystem, only a few links can be chosen on which to base particular TPCs. If we have understood the subsystem well enough, these few links, at each of which a TPC is developed, will act as diagnostic points at which we can monitor the performance of the subsystem adequately. A broadened definition of a TPC is presented, supporting this approach.

Conservation implications: The concept of thresholds (initially ecological thresholds) has started influencing conservation management practice, a commonly-used formulation for management decision-making being the threshold of potential concern (TPC). Practical TPC usage can often be improved by moving away from its initially pure ecological outlook, rather framing understanding through an interlinked socio-ecological view.


Keywords

cause-and-effect diagram; complexity; learning; monitoring; thresholds of potential concern, values

Metrics

Total abstract views: 9387
Total article views: 15482

 

Crossref Citations

1. Using Strategic Adaptive Management to Facilitate Implementation of Environmental Flow Programs in Complex Social-Ecological Systems
John Conallin, Josh Campbell, Lee Baumgartner
Environmental Management  vol: 62  issue: 5  first page: 955  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1091-9

2. Integrating decision triggers into conservation management practice
Kelly de Bie, Prue F. E. Addison, Carly N. Cook, Tien Ming Lee
Journal of Applied Ecology  vol: 55  issue: 2  first page: 494  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13042

3. Bounded ranges of variation as a framework for future conservation and fire management
Max A. Moritz, Matthew D. Hurteau, Katharine N. Suding, Carla M. D'Antonio
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences  vol: 1286  issue: 1  first page: 92  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12104

4. Co-defining program success: Identifying objectives and indicators for a livestock damage compensation scheme at Kruger National Park, South Africa
Brandon P. Anthony, Louise Swemmer
Journal for Nature Conservation  vol: 26  first page: 65  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.05.004

5. Adaptive and transformative learning in environmental water management: Implementing the Crocodile River’s Ecological Reserve in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Craig A. McLoughlin, Eddie S. Riddell, Robin M. Petersen, Jacques Venter
KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science  vol: 63  issue: 1  year: 2021  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v63i1.1663

6. Advances and challenges in the implementation of strategic adaptive management beyond the Kruger National Park – Making linkages between science and biodiversity management
Angela Gaylard, Sam Ferreira
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1005

7. Investigating the influence of tourism on the Wadden Sea using a multi-layer social-ecological network
Sabine Horn, Cédric L. Meunier, Gesche Krause, Liliana Solé
Ocean & Coastal Management  vol: 266  first page: 107686  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107686

8. Detecting changes in fish behaviour in real time to alert managers to thresholds of potential concern
Matthew J. Burnett, Vanessa Süßle, Terence Saayman, Graham Jewitt, Gordon C. O'Brien, Colleen T. Downs
River Research and Applications  vol: 40  issue: 1  first page: 129  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1002/rra.4214

9. Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End?“Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and PracticeInteracting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern AfghanistanUrban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice?Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation?The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note
Simin Davoudi, Keith Shaw, L. Jamila Haider, Allyson E. Quinlan, Garry D. Peterson, Cathy Wilkinson, Hartmut Fünfgeld, Darryn McEvoy, Libby Porter, Simin Davoudi
Planning Theory & Practice  vol: 13  issue: 2  first page: 299  year: 2012  
doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124

10. Application of thresholds of potential concern and limits of acceptable change in the condition assessment of a significant wetland
Kerrylee Rogers, Neil Saintilan, Matthew J. Colloff, Li Wen
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment  vol: 185  issue: 10  first page: 8583  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3197-0

11. Adaptive Management of Malkumba-Coongie Lakes Ramsar Site in Arid Australia—A Free Flowing River and Wetland System
Richard T. Kingsford, Craig A. McLoughlin, Robert Brandle, Gilad Bino, Bernie Cockayne, David Schmarr, Travis Gotch, Vol Norris, Justin McCann
Sustainability  vol: 13  issue: 6  first page: 3043  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/su13063043

12. Finding Common Ground between Adaptive Management and Evidence-Based Approaches to Biodiversity Conservation
Lindsey Gillson, Harry Biggs, Izak P.J. Smit, Malika Virah-Sawmy, Kevin Rogers
Trends in Ecology & Evolution  vol: 34  issue: 1  first page: 31  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.003

13. The development of a tourism research framework by South African National Parks to inform management
Duan Biggs, Louise Swemmer, Glen Phillips, Joep Stevens, Stefanie Freitag, Rina Grant
Koedoe  vol: 56  issue: 2  year: 2014  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v56i2.1164

14. Marginalised herders: Social dynamics and natural resource use in the fragile environment of the Richtersveld National Park, South Africa
L.M. Michler, A.C. Treydte, H. Hayat, S. Lemke
Environmental Development  vol: 29  first page: 29  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.12.001

15. Groundwater as a social-ecological system: A framework for managing groundwater in Pacific Small Island Developing States
Louis Bouchet, Martin C. Thoms, Melissa Parsons
Groundwater for Sustainable Development  vol: 8  first page: 579  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.02.008

16. Defining a Safe Operating Space for inland recreational fisheries
Stephen R Carpenter, William A Brock, Gretchen J A Hansen, Jonathan F Hansen, Joseph M Hennessy, Daniel A Isermann, Eric J Pedersen, K Martin Perales, Andrew L Rypel, Greg G Sass, Tyler D Tunney, M Jake Vander Zanden
Fish and Fisheries  vol: 18  issue: 6  first page: 1150  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1111/faf.12230

17. Efficient Evaluation of Biodiversity Concerns in Protected Areas
Sam Ferreira, Mahlomola Daemane, Andrew Deacon, Hendrik Sithole, Hugo Bezuidenhout
International Journal of Biodiversity  vol: 2013  first page: 1  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1155/2013/298968

18. Dynamics of Tea Production in Assam: A Time Series Forecasting Approach
Nandita Debnath, Giribabu Mahasamudram, Dipankar Saha
Current Agriculture Research Journal  vol: 3  issue: 13  first page: 711  year: 2026  
doi: 10.12944/CARJ.13.3.5

19. From numbers to ecosystems and biodiversity: A mechanistic approach to monitoring
Sam Ferreira, Andrew Deacon, Hendrik Sithole, Hugo Bezuidenhout, Mahlomola Daemane, Marna Herbst
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.998

20. Reflexive learning in adaptive management: A case study of environmental water management in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia
Craig A. McLoughlin, Martin C. Thoms, Melissa Parsons
River Research and Applications  vol: 36  issue: 4  first page: 681  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1002/rra.3607

21. Beyond Calendars and Maps: Rethinking Time and Space for Effective Knowledge Governance in Protected Areas
Claudia Múnera-Roldán, Dirk Roux, Matthew Colloff, Lorrae van Kerkhoff
Land  vol: 9  issue: 9  first page: 293  year: 2020  
doi: 10.3390/land9090293

22. The development and application of strategic adaptive management within South African National Parks
Dirk J. Roux, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1049

23. Features associated with effective biodiversity monitoring and evaluation
Kelly M. Dixon, Geoffrey J. Cary, Graeme L. Worboys, Sam C. Banks, Philip Gibbons
Biological Conservation  vol: 238  first page: 108221  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108221

24. Reconstructing Grazer Assemblages for Protected Area Restoration
Jan A. Venter, Herbert H. T. Prins, David A. Balfour, Rob Slotow, Matt Hayward
PLoS ONE  vol: 9  issue: 3  first page: e90900  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090900

25. Strategic Adaptive Management for Transparency, Accountability and Learning: Insights from More Than a Quarter Century of Practice
Dirk J. Roux, Richard T. Kingsford, Jessica Cockburn
Environmental Management  vol: 75  issue: 10  first page: 2521  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02272-5

26. Exploring the Interface Between Planetary Boundaries and Palaeoecology
Lindsey Gillson, Alistair Seddon, Ondřej Mottl, Ke Zhang, Kelly Kirsten, Peter Gell, Rob A. Marchant, Christoph Schwörer, Estelle Razanatsoa, Paul J. Lane, Colin J. Courtney‐Mustaphi, John Dearing
Global Change Biology  vol: 31  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1111/gcb.70017

27. Engaging with the future: framings of adaptation to climate change in conservation
Claudia Munera-Roldan, Matthew J. Colloff, Bruno Locatelli, Carina Wyborn
Ecosystems and People  vol: 18  issue: 1  first page: 174  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1080/26395916.2022.2043940

28. From myopia to clarity: sharpening the focus of ecosystem management through the lens of palaeoecology
Lindsey Gillson, Rob Marchant
Trends in Ecology & Evolution  vol: 29  issue: 6  first page: 317  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.03.010

29. Decision triggers are a critical part of evidence-based conservation
Carly N. Cook, Kelly de Bie, David A. Keith, Prue F.E. Addison
Biological Conservation  vol: 195  first page: 46  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.024