Essay

Advances and challenges in the implementation of strategic adaptive management beyond the Kruger National Park – Making linkages between science and biodiversity management

Angela Gaylard, Sam Ferreira
Koedoe | Vol 53, No 2 | a1005 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1005 | © 2011 Angela Gaylard, Sam Ferreira | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 24 May 2010 | Published: 10 May 2011

About the author(s)

Angela Gaylard, Savanna Research Unit, Conservation Services, South African National Parks, Garden Route Regional Office, Knysna, South Africa
Sam Ferreira, Savanna Research Unit, Conservation Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa

Abstract

South African National Parks (SANParks) makes use of strategic adaptive management (SAM) to achieve its primary mandate of biodiversity conservation. This involves an iterative adaptive planning, management and review cycle to ensure appropriate alignment of stakeholder values with conservation objectives, to address the uncertainty inherent in complex social– economic–ecological systems and to learn explicitly whilst doing so. Adaptive management is recognised as the most logical framework for continuous improvement in natural resource management; nevertheless, several challenges in its implementation remain. This paper outlined these challenges and the various modifications to SANParks’ adaptive planning and management process that have emerged during its development. We demonstrated how the establishment of a regular Science–Management Forum provides opportunities for social colearning amongst resource managers and scientists of a particular park, whilst providing other positive spin-offs that mature the SAM process across the organisation. We discussed the use of particular conceptual constructs that clarify the link between monitoring, management requirements and operational endpoints, providing the context within which Thresholds of Potential Concern (TPCs) should be set, prioritised and measured. The evolution of the TPC concept was also discussed in the context of its use by other organisations, whilst recognising its current limitations within SANParks. Finally, we discussed remaining implementation challenges and uncertainties, and suggested a way forward for SAM.

Conservation implications: This paper outlined practical methods of implementing SAM in conservation areas, beyond what has already been learnt within, and documented for, the Kruger National Park. It also highlighted several implementation challenges that prove useful to other conservation agencies planning to adopt this approach to managing complex ecosystems.


Keywords

strategic adaptive management, South African National Parks, science-management forum, social learning, Thresholds of Potential Concern, implementation challenges, requisite simplicity

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8766
Total article views: 17887

 

Crossref Citations

1. Estimating conservation effectiveness across protected areas in Limpopo Province, South Africa
Luna Milatović, Brandon P. Anthony, Anthony Swemmer
KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science  vol: 61  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v61i1.1530

2. Top‐down conservation targets and bottom‐up management action: creating complementary feedbacks for freshwater conservation
Dirk J. Roux, Jeanne L. Nel, Ruth‐Mary Fisher, Jaco Barendse
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems  vol: 26  issue: 2  first page: 364  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1002/aqc.2577

3. Co-defining program success: Identifying objectives and indicators for a livestock damage compensation scheme at Kruger National Park, South Africa
Brandon P. Anthony, Louise Swemmer
Journal for Nature Conservation  vol: 26  first page: 65  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.05.004

4. How assessment and reflection relate to more effective learning in adaptive management
Harry Biggs, Charles Breen, Rob Slotow, Stefanie Freitag, Marc Hockings
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1001

5. Appraising strategic adaptive management as a process of organizational learning
Dirk J. Roux, Peter Novellie, Izak P.J. Smit, Joop de Kraker, Samantha Mc Culloch-Jones, Luthando E. Dziba, Stefanie Freitag, Danie J. Pienaar
Journal of Environmental Management  vol: 301  first page: 113920  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113920

6. Taking stock after a decade: Does the ‘thresholds of potential concern’ concept need a socio-ecological revamp?
Harry Biggs, Sam Ferreira, Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson, Rina Grant-Biggs
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1002

7. Top-down and bottom-up processes to implement biological monitoring in protected areas
Carly Cowell, Charlene Bissett, Sam M. Ferreira
Journal of Environmental Management  vol: 257  first page: 109998  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109998

8. Stakeholder values on the management of African elephants for large tree conservation in protected areas
Robin M. Cook, Ed T. F. Witkowski, Michelle D. Henley
European Journal of Wildlife Research  vol: 71  issue: 5  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s10344-025-01989-2

9. The development of a tourism research framework by South African National Parks to inform management
Duan Biggs, Louise Swemmer, Glen Phillips, Joep Stevens, Stefanie Freitag, Rina Grant
Koedoe  vol: 56  issue: 2  year: 2014  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v56i2.1164

10. Adaptive Management of Malkumba-Coongie Lakes Ramsar Site in Arid Australia—A Free Flowing River and Wetland System
Richard T. Kingsford, Craig A. McLoughlin, Robert Brandle, Gilad Bino, Bernie Cockayne, David Schmarr, Travis Gotch, Vol Norris, Justin McCann
Sustainability  vol: 13  issue: 6  first page: 3043  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/su13063043

11. Research, monitoring, and reflection as a guide to the management of complex ecosystems: The case of fire in the Kruger National Park, South Africa
Brian W. van Wilgen, Tercia Strydom, Chenay Simms, Izak P. J. Smit
Conservation Science and Practice  vol: 4  issue: 4  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1111/csp2.12658

12. Understanding and overcoming obstacles in adaptive management
Johan Månsson, Louise Eriksson, Isla Hodgson, Johan Elmberg, Nils Bunnefeld, Rebecca Hessel, Maria Johansson, Niklas Liljebäck, Lovisa Nilsson, Camilla Olsson, Tomas Pärt, Camilla Sandström, Ingunn Tombre, Steve M. Redpath
Trends in Ecology & Evolution  vol: 38  issue: 1  first page: 55  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.08.009

13. From numbers to ecosystems and biodiversity: A mechanistic approach to monitoring
Sam Ferreira, Andrew Deacon, Hendrik Sithole, Hugo Bezuidenhout, Mahlomola Daemane, Marna Herbst
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.998

14. Features associated with effective biodiversity monitoring and evaluation
Kelly M. Dixon, Geoffrey J. Cary, Graeme L. Worboys, Sam C. Banks, Philip Gibbons
Biological Conservation  vol: 238  first page: 108221  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108221

15. The development and application of strategic adaptive management within South African National Parks
Dirk J. Roux, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1049

16. Megafaunal effects on vegetation structure throughout a densely wooded African landscape
Andrew B. Davies, Angela Gaylard, Gregory P. Asner
Ecological Applications  vol: 28  issue: 2  first page: 398  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1002/eap.1655

17. Reconstructing Grazer Assemblages for Protected Area Restoration
Jan A. Venter, Herbert H. T. Prins, David A. Balfour, Rob Slotow, Matt Hayward
PLoS ONE  vol: 9  issue: 3  first page: e90900  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090900

18. Wire netting reduces African elephant (Loxodonta africana) impact to selected trees in South Africa
Kelly Derham, Michelle D. Henley, Bruce A. Schulte
Koedoe  vol: 58  issue: 1  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v58i1.1327

19. Challenges of small protected areas in urban cities: a case study of Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India
Niraj Sharma, Shweta Gaur, Rajni Dhyani, Anil Singh
Environment, Development and Sustainability  vol: 18  issue: 1  first page: 295  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1007/s10668-015-9628-z

20. National laws and policies can enable or confound adaptive governance: Examples from South African national parks
Peter Novellie, Harry Biggs, Dirk Roux
Environmental Science & Policy  vol: 66  first page: 40  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.08.005

21. Bias and precision of predicted densities of overabundant kangaroo populations
Jim Hone, Melissa Snape
Ecological Management & Restoration  vol: 25  issue: 3  first page: 182  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1111/emr.12613

22. Management of Reintroduced Lions in Small, Fenced Reserves in South Africa: An Assessment and Guidelines
S.M. Miller, C. Bissett, A. Burger, B. Courtenay, T. Dickerson, D.J. Druce, S. Ferreira, P.J. Funston, D. Hofmeyr, P.J. Kilian, W. Matthews, S. Naylor, D.M. Parker, R. Slotow, M. Toft, D. Zimmermann
South African Journal of Wildlife Research  vol: 43  issue: 2  first page: 138  year: 2013  
doi: 10.3957/056.043.0202

23. From myopia to clarity: sharpening the focus of ecosystem management through the lens of palaeoecology
Lindsey Gillson, Rob Marchant
Trends in Ecology & Evolution  vol: 29  issue: 6  first page: 317  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.03.010

24. On the theory-practice gap in the environmental realm: perspectives from and for diverse environmental professionals
Steven J. Cooke, Amanda L. Jeanson, Ian Bishop, Brett A. Bryan, Chundi Chen, Christopher Cvitanovic, Yang Fen, John Forester, Christine Fürst, Jie Hu, Daniele La Rosa, Colin Meurk, Vivian M. Nguyen, Michael Paolisso, Yunfei Qi, Faith K. S. Chun, Katrina Szetey, Xinhao Wang, Yuncai Wang, Carla L. Archibald, Nathan Young
Socio-Ecological Practice Research  vol: 3  issue: 3  first page: 243  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1007/s42532-021-00089-0

25. The case for embedding researchers in conservation agencies
Dirk J. Roux, Richard T. Kingsford, Carly N. Cook, Jane Carruthers, Katrina Dickson, Marc Hockings
Conservation Biology  vol: 33  issue: 6  first page: 1266  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13324