Essay

Prioritising species of special concern for monitoring in Table Mountain National Park: The challenge of a species-rich, threatened ecosystem

Tony G. Rebelo, Stefanie Freitag, Chad Cheney, Melodie A. McGeoch
Koedoe | Vol 53, No 2 | a1019 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1019 | © 2011 Tony G. Rebelo, Stefanie Freitag, Chad Cheney, Melodie A. McGeoch | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 August 2010 | Published: 12 May 2011

About the author(s)

Tony G. Rebelo, Threatened Species Research Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, South Africa
Stefanie Freitag, Kruger National Park, South African National Parks, South Africa
Chad Cheney, Table Mountain National Park, South African National Parks, South Africa
Melodie A. McGeoch, Cape Research Centre, South African National Parks, South Africa

Abstract

Conservation requires that species are monitored to ensure the persistence of species and ecosystem processes. In areas with large numbers of threatened species, this can be a major challenge. Here we explore prioritising species of special concern on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa, conserved primarily in the Table Mountain National Park. With 307 terrestrial plant and animal species listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List (plus 208 as non-least concern) and 332 endemic to the Peninsula, it is impossible to monitor and manage all species with current resources. At a workshop of conservation managers and ecosystem and taxonomical specialists, 14 variables were incorporated into a simple scoring scheme to develop a priority listing of these species. Despite care to ensure that variables were independent, there was strong autocorrelation amongst biotic versus management variables. There was concern that biotic variables would be masked by management criteria, but this was not the case. We propose that monitoring should focus on as many top-scoring species as resources allow (including volunteers) and that setting a cut-off value for delimiting sensitive species should be eschewed. A major challenge is that many species are typical of lowland ecosystems, which are poorly represented in the national park. Although priority species for monitoring have been identified, this will need to be tempered with the monitoring costs and logistics of implementing the programme.

Conservation implications: Owing to the large number of threatened and endemic species in the Cape Peninsula, it is impossible to monitor all species with current resources. Management must focus on ecosystem maintenance as species-focused management will inevitably result in conflict with other threatened species. Monitoring should focus on as many top-scoring species as resources allow. The costs and logistics of a monitoring programme still need to be worked out.


Keywords

Endemic species, IUCN Red List, monitoring, prioritization, species-rich ecosystems, thresholds of potential concern

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8207
Total article views: 26056

 

Crossref Citations

1. Honey badgers in and around Table Mountain National Park, Cape Town
Nicoli Nattrass, Benjamin S. Wittenberg, Zoë Woodgate, M. Justin O’Riain
Koedoe  vol: 66  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/KOEDOE.v66i1.1827

2. Lessons learned from compiling a flora checklist for the Cape Peninsula, South Africa
Anthony G. Rebelo, Patricia M. Holmes, Dian Spear, Ronell R. Klopper, Nicola J. van Wilgen
Koedoe  vol: 67  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.4102/KOEDOE.v67i1.1856

3. Urban threats and conservation measures relating to aquatic arthropods on the iconic Table Mountain, South Africa: A review
Charl Deacon, Michael J. Samways
Basic and Applied Ecology  vol: 56  first page: 192  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.07.009

4. Impacts of urbanization in a biodiversity hotspot: Conservation challenges in Metropolitan Cape Town
A.G. Rebelo, P.M. Holmes, C. Dorse, J. Wood
South African Journal of Botany  vol: 77  issue: 1  first page: 20  year: 2011  
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.04.006

5. Prioritising species for monitoring in a South African protected area and the Red List for plants
Carly R. Cowell, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Pippin M. L. Anderson, Tarciso Leão, Jenny Williams, Wendy A. Annecke
Biodiversity and Conservation  vol: 32  issue: 1  first page: 119  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1007/s10531-022-02488-5

6. Assessing the association between pathways of alien plant invaders and their impacts in protected areas
Llewellyn C. Foxcroft, Dian Spear, Nicola J. van Wilgen, Melodie A. McGeoch
NeoBiota  vol: 43  first page: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.3897/neobiota.43.29644

7. Top-down and bottom-up processes to implement biological monitoring in protected areas
Carly Cowell, Charlene Bissett, Sam M. Ferreira
Journal of Environmental Management  vol: 257  first page: 109998  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109998

8. Checklist of the spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Table Mountain National Park, South Africa
Charles R. Haddad, Anna S. Dippenaar-Schoeman
Koedoe  vol: 66  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/KOEDOE.v66i1.1797

9. A little goes a long way: a rapid sampling protocol repeated seasonally generates considerable spider biodiversity data in an arid national park
Charles R. Haddad, Ruan Booysen, Michael E. Vickers, Reginald Christiaan, Adriaan Stander, Anna S. Dippenaar-Schoeman, Aileen van der Mescht
Biodiversity and Conservation  vol: 34  issue: 10  first page: 3453  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s10531-025-03107-9

10. Plant checklist for Table Mountain National Park and surrounding areas
Anthony Rebelo, Patricia Holmes, Ronell Klopper, Dian Spear, Nicola van Wilgen
Koedoe  vol: 67  issue: 1  year: 2026  
doi: 10.4102/KOEDOE.v67i1.1855

11. The development and application of strategic adaptive management within South African National Parks
Dirk J. Roux, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1049

12. A ranking system for prescribed burn prioritization in Table Mountain National Park, South Africa
Carly Ruth Cowell, Chad Cheney
Journal of Environmental Management  vol: 190  first page: 283  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.070

13. How assessment and reflection relate to more effective learning in adaptive management
Harry Biggs, Charles Breen, Rob Slotow, Stefanie Freitag, Marc Hockings
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1001

14. The faunistic diversity of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of the South African Cape Floristic Kingdom
A. S. Dippenaar-Schoeman, C. R. Haddad, S. H. Foord, L. N. Lotz
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa  vol: 79  issue: 1  first page: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/0035919X.2024.2324912

15. Evaluating herbivore management outcomes and associated vegetation impacts
Rina C.C. Grant, Mike J.S. Peel, Hugo Bezuidenhout
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1008

16. Abiotic variables dictate the best monitoring times for the endangered Table Mountain stag beetle (Colophon westwoodi Gray 1832, Coleoptera: Lucanidae)
Francois Roets, James S. Pryke, Melodie A. McGeoch
Journal of Insect Conservation  vol: 17  issue: 2  first page: 279  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1007/s10841-012-9507-y