Original Research
Elephants respond to resource trade-offs in an aseasonal system through daily and annual variability in resource selection
Submitted: 10 June 2015 | Published: 28 March 2017
About the author(s)
Timothy J. Fullman, Department of Geography, University of Florida, United StatesGregory A. Kiker, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, United States; School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Angela Gaylard, Conservation Services, South African National Parks, Garden Route Regional Office, South Africa
Jane Southworth, Department of Geography, University of Florida, United States
Peter Waylen, Department of Geography, University of Florida, United States
Graham I.H. Kerley, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa
Abstract
Animals and humans regularly make trade-offs between competing objectives. In Addo Elephant National Park (AENP), elephants (Loxodonta africana) trade off selection of resources, while managers balance tourist desires with conservation of elephants and rare plants. Elephant resource selection has been examined in seasonal savannas, but is understudied in aseasonal systems like AENP. Understanding elephant selection may suggest ways to minimise management trade-offs. We evaluated how elephants select vegetation productivity, distance to water, slope and terrain ruggedness across time in AENP and used this information to suggest management strategies that balance the needs of tourists and biodiversity. Resource selection functions with time-interacted covariates were developed for female elephants, using three data sets of daily movement to capture circadian and annual patterns of resource use. Results were predicted in areas of AENP currently unavailable to elephants to explore potential effects of future elephant access. Elephants displayed dynamic resource selection at daily and annual scales to meet competing requirements for resources. In summer, selection patterns generally conformed to those seen in savannas, but these relationships became weaker or reversed in winter. At daily scales, resource selection in the morning differed from that of midday and afternoon, likely reflecting trade-offs between acquiring sufficient forage and water. Dynamic selection strategies exist even in an aseasonal system, with both daily and annual patterns. This reinforces the importance of considering changing resource availability and trade-offs in studies of animal selection.
Conservation implications: Guiding tourism based on knowledge of elephant habitat selection may improve viewing success without requiring increased elephant numbers. If AENP managers expand elephant habitat to reduce density, our model predicts where elephant use may concentrate and where botanical reserves may be needed to protect rare plants from elephant impacts.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5712Total article views: 6196
Crossref Citations
1. The influence of biophysical characteristics on elephant space use in an African savanna
Liberty Mlambo, Elhadi Adam, Munyaradzi Davis Shekede, John Odindi
Ecological Informatics vol: 82 first page: 102724 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102724