Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment report quality in South African national parks
Submitted: 26 March 2020 | Published: 16 September 2020
About the author(s)
Luke A. Sandham, School of Geo and Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaCarla Huysamen, School of Geo and Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Francois P. Retief, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Angus Morrison-Saunders, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; and, Centre for Ecosystem Management, School of Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
Alan J. Bond, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; and, School of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
Jenny Pope, Unit for Environmental Science and Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; and, Integral Sustainability, Perth, Australia
Reece C. Alberts, Unit for Environmental Science and Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Abstract
This research evaluates Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report quality for a selected sample of development projects in South African national parks. It applies an adapted version of an international EIA report quality review package to 24 developments within 10 national parks, across three EIA regimes. The results suggest good EIA report quality across all four quality review areas, with improvement over time, but also highlight particular weaknesses in terms of dealing with waste and, to a lesser extent, with significance and mitigation. To build on this research, the development of a sector-specific EIA report quality review package is recommended, with more emphasis on the strategic context, waste and water-related aspects. The conclusion is that EIA is well positioned to remain an important decision support instrument for developments within national parks.
Conservation implications: The results show that EIA reports for developments in South African national parks are generally of sufficient quality for decision-making that benefits conservation. However, weaker performance regarding waste, significance determination, water-related impacts and a lack of consideration of strategic context requires a conservation-specific EIA report quality review package to improve report quality in the areas of weakness and thereby increase the value of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance and sustainable development in conservation areas.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5283Total article views: 10821
Crossref Citations
1. An evaluation of air quality impact prediction performance undertaken as part of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in India
Hairul Sharani Mohd Radzuan, Jeff Martin
Heliyon vol: 10 issue: 11 first page: e31263 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31263
2. Environmental assessment simplification in Botswana – is it fit for purpose?
Gorata Kingsley Matome, Thomas B. Fischer
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 42 issue: 3 first page: 267 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2024.2363720
3. Quality of environmental impact statements (EISs) in Eswatini: 1996 – 2020
Emmanuel Nkosinathi Cele
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 40 issue: 5 first page: 399 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2102879
4. Unique features of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in protected areas (PAs) – towards best practice principles
F. P. Retief, R. C. Alberts, D. Cilliers, C. Roos, J. Moolman, A. Bond
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 43 issue: 3 first page: 171 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2025.2470936
5. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) effectiveness in protected areas
Reece Cronje Alberts, Francois Pieter Retief, Dirk Petrus Cilliers, Claudine Roos, Morgan Hauptfleisch
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 39 issue: 4 first page: 290 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2021.1904377
6. EIA decision-making and administrative justice: the substance of just decisions
R.C. Alberts, F.P. Retief, J. Arts, C. Roos, D.P Cilliers, T.B. Fischer
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 40 issue: 4 first page: 296 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2066445
7. Quest for NetZero emissions in South African national parks: A tourism perspective
Godwell Nhamo, Kaitano Dube, Lazarus Chapungu, David Chikodzi
Heliyon vol: 9 issue: 6 first page: e16410 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16410
8. Evaluating the quality of Environmental Impact Assessment Reports (EIARs) for tourism developments in protected areas: The Kruger to Canyons Biosphere case study
Keletso V. Malepe, Ainhoa González, Francois P. Retief
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 40 issue: 5 first page: 384 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2091055
9. The consideration of waste management in environmental impact assessment (EIA) for developments in protected areas
C.E. Claassens, D.P. Cilliers, F.P. Retief, C. Roos, R.C. Alberts
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 40 issue: 4 first page: 320 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2080491
10. Understanding stakeholder experiences with visual communication in environmental impact assessment
Ana Roque de Oliveira, Sofia Bento, Maria Partidário, Angus Morrison-Saunders
Environmental Impact Assessment Review vol: 102 first page: 107210 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107210
11. Using environmental and social impact assessment to improve tourism infrastructure projects in protected areas: green tourism in the Kalinzu Central Forest Reserve in Uganda
Pius Kahangirwe, Frank Vanclay, Jos Arts
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management first page: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/09640568.2025.2539347
12. Exploring the application of environmental impact assessment to tourism and recreation in protected areas: a systematic literature review
Gabriela Francisco Pegler, Clara Carvalho de Lemos, Victor Eduardo Lima Ranieri
Environment, Development and Sustainability vol: 27 issue: 7 first page: 15053 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04532-6
13. Proposing principles towards responsible waste management in South African protected areas
Claudine Roos, Reece C. Alberts, Francois P. Retief, Dirk P. Cilliers, Alan J. Bond
Koedoe vol: 65 issue: 1 year: 2023
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v65i1.1753
14. Reviewing the quality of Environmental Impact Statements of Brazilian landfills: insights for promoting efficiency in final disposal
Giovano Candiani, Luciana Varanda Rizzo, Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 43 issue: 1 first page: 16 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2025.2456445
15. A review of the quality of environmental impact statements with a focus on urban projects from Romania
Andreea Nita, Constantina-Alina Hossu, Cristina G. Mitincu, Ioan-Cristian Iojă
Ecological Informatics vol: 70 first page: 101723 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101723
16. Evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Ethiopia
Gizaw Ebissa, Utant Debebe, Hailu Worku, Aramde Fetene
Heliyon vol: 8 issue: 12 first page: e12438 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12438
17. Impacts of offshore wind farms: significant for whom?
Fernanda A. Veronez, Ana Paula A. Dibo, Juliana Siqueira-Gay, Carla G. Duarte, Alexander Turra, Luis E. Sánchez
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 44 issue: 1 first page: 39 year: 2026
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2026.2621472
18. Developing an evaluation approach to consider the influence of country context on environmental impact assessment performance, from a southern African perspective
Abdulhakim Aljareo, Ingrid Watson, Ute Schwaibold
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management vol: 19 issue: 6 first page: 1510 year: 2023
doi: 10.1002/ieam.4771
19. Exploring the use of visitor surveys as a tool for supporting EIA follow-up in protected areas: a case study of a conference centre in an iconic national park
J. A. Wessels, A. Douglas
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal vol: 42 issue: 3 first page: 229 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2024.2355707
20. Questioning the Merit of Streamlining the Regulation of Activities in the Kruger National Park Through the Use of Environmental Management Instruments and Environmental Impact Assessment Exclusions
Alexander Paterson, Reece Alberts, Richard Summers, Francois Retief, Andy Blackmore
Southern African Public Law year: 2025
doi: 10.25159/2522-6800/16743