Original Research

First guidelines and suggested best protocol for surveying African elephants (Loxodonta africana) using a drone

Wesley L. Hartmann, Vicki Fishlock, Alison Leslie
Koedoe | Vol 63, No 1 | a1687 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v63i1.1687 | © 2021 Wesley L. Hartmann, Vicki Fishlock, Alison Leslie | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 06 May 2021 | Published: 06 September 2021

About the author(s)

Wesley L. Hartmann, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Vicki Fishlock, Amboseli Trust for Elephants, Nairobi, Kenya; and Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Alison Leslie, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones, are increasingly used in ecological management, conservation and research. Numerous reviews on drones tout almost unlimited potential within the wildlife sciences as they open up inaccessible habitats to observation. However, the influence of drones on the animals themselves is far less understood, and impact studies to construct protocols for best practices are urgently needed to minimise the potential for stress on target species. The impact of a quadcopter drone’s approach speed, angle of approach and initial starting altitude was tested on the behavioural responses of African elephants (Loxodonta africana), along with sustained speed and flight pattern. Seventy-nine approach flights and 70 presence flights were conducted. The speed and angle of approach significantly impacted the success of a flight, but neither speed nor flight pattern had any measurable impact on elephants’ behaviour during sustained flights. It is recommended that drones be launched at a distance of 100 m from an elephant or a herd of elephants, ascending to a height of 50 m by using an approach speed of 2m/s and an approach angle of 45 ° or less to successfully contact elephant targets.

Conservation implications: This study aimed to provide a significant step towards the ethical use of drones in wildlife research. Further research is required to investigate the impacts of drones on other taxa. Physiological responses to drones, for example, would determine if physiological stress responses unlinked to behavioural indicators are of concern in elephants.


Keywords

African elephant; aerial monitoring; drones; ethology; elephant behaviour; technology; unmanned aerial vehicles.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5895
Total article views: 5817

 

Crossref Citations

1. Elephant habituation to drones as a behavioural observation tool
Angus Carey-Douglas, Liam Jasperse-Sjolander, Paul Kokiro, Gideon Galimogle Ilterewa, David Lolchuragi, Jemima Elizabeth Scrase, Frank Pope, Fritz Vollrath, Giacomo D’Ammando
Scientific Reports  vol: 15  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-25762-2

2. Koalas showed limited behavioural response and no physiological response to drones
Diane Colombelli-Négrel, Imogen Z. Sach, Ian Hough, Jarrod C. Hodgson, Christopher B. Daniels, Sonia Kleindorfer
Applied Animal Behaviour Science  vol: 264  first page: 105963  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105963

3. On the move: Influence of animal movements on count error during drone surveys
Emma A. Schultz, Natasha Ellison‐Neary, Melanie R. Boudreau, Garrett M. Street, Landon R. Jones, Kristine O. Evans, Raymond B. Iglay
Ecology and Evolution  vol: 14  issue: 10  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1002/ece3.70287

4. Mapping potential human-elephant conflict hotspots with UAV monitoring data
Nan Yang, Xiaohua Dai, Bin Wang, Mangcai Wen, Zhongli Gan, Zelin Li, Kevin J. Duffy
Global Ecology and Conservation  vol: 43  first page: e02451  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02451

5. Pilot perceptions of options to manage drone-wildlife interactions; associations with wildlife value orientations and connectedness to nature
Elyce Gray, Michael A. Weston
Journal for Nature Conservation  vol: 64  first page: 126090  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126090

6. Assessing sampling error associated with animal movements and distributions across drone monitoring strategies
Emma A. Schultz, Natasha Ellison-Neary, Landon R. Jones, Kristine O. Evans, Raymond B. Iglay
Ecological Modelling  vol: 508  first page: 111235  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111235

7. Impact of Drone Disturbances on Wildlife: A Review
Saadia Afridi, Lucie Laporte-Devylder, Guy Maalouf, Jenna M. Kline, Samuel G. Penny, Kasper Hlebowicz, Dylan Cawthorne, Ulrik Pagh Schultz Lundquist
Drones  vol: 9  issue: 4  first page: 311  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3390/drones9040311

8. Justice and ethics in conservation remote sensing: Current discourses and research needs
Natalie D.L. York, Rose Pritchard, Laura Aileen Sauls, Charis Enns, Timothy Foster
Biological Conservation  vol: 287  first page: 110319  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110319

9. Elephants and algorithms: a review of the current and future role of AI in elephant monitoring
Leandra Brickson, Libby Zhang, Fritz Vollrath, Iain Douglas-Hamilton, Alexander J. Titus
Journal of The Royal Society Interface  vol: 20  issue: 208  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0367

10. Modifying a mini drone for remote drug delivery for wildlife medicine
Marnoch Yindee, Patcharapol Khumngoen, Wallaya Manatchaiworakul, Tuempong Wongtawan
Drone Systems and Applications  vol: 12  first page: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1139/dsa-2024-0015