Original Research
First guidelines and suggested best protocol for surveying African elephants (Loxodonta africana) using a drone
Submitted: 06 May 2021 | Published: 06 September 2021
About the author(s)
Wesley L. Hartmann, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South AfricaVicki Fishlock, Amboseli Trust for Elephants, Nairobi, Kenya; and Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Alison Leslie, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones, are increasingly used in ecological management, conservation and research. Numerous reviews on drones tout almost unlimited potential within the wildlife sciences as they open up inaccessible habitats to observation. However, the influence of drones on the animals themselves is far less understood, and impact studies to construct protocols for best practices are urgently needed to minimise the potential for stress on target species. The impact of a quadcopter drone’s approach speed, angle of approach and initial starting altitude was tested on the behavioural responses of African elephants (Loxodonta africana), along with sustained speed and flight pattern. Seventy-nine approach flights and 70 presence flights were conducted. The speed and angle of approach significantly impacted the success of a flight, but neither speed nor flight pattern had any measurable impact on elephants’ behaviour during sustained flights. It is recommended that drones be launched at a distance of 100 m from an elephant or a herd of elephants, ascending to a height of 50 m by using an approach speed of 2m/s and an approach angle of 45 ° or less to successfully contact elephant targets.
Conservation implications: This study aimed to provide a significant step towards the ethical use of drones in wildlife research. Further research is required to investigate the impacts of drones on other taxa. Physiological responses to drones, for example, would determine if physiological stress responses unlinked to behavioural indicators are of concern in elephants.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5895Total article views: 5817
Crossref Citations
1. Elephant habituation to drones as a behavioural observation tool
Angus Carey-Douglas, Liam Jasperse-Sjolander, Paul Kokiro, Gideon Galimogle Ilterewa, David Lolchuragi, Jemima Elizabeth Scrase, Frank Pope, Fritz Vollrath, Giacomo D’Ammando
Scientific Reports vol: 15 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-25762-2
2. Koalas showed limited behavioural response and no physiological response to drones
Diane Colombelli-Négrel, Imogen Z. Sach, Ian Hough, Jarrod C. Hodgson, Christopher B. Daniels, Sonia Kleindorfer
Applied Animal Behaviour Science vol: 264 first page: 105963 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105963
3. On the move: Influence of animal movements on count error during drone surveys
Emma A. Schultz, Natasha Ellison‐Neary, Melanie R. Boudreau, Garrett M. Street, Landon R. Jones, Kristine O. Evans, Raymond B. Iglay
Ecology and Evolution vol: 14 issue: 10 year: 2024
doi: 10.1002/ece3.70287
4. Mapping potential human-elephant conflict hotspots with UAV monitoring data
Nan Yang, Xiaohua Dai, Bin Wang, Mangcai Wen, Zhongli Gan, Zelin Li, Kevin J. Duffy
Global Ecology and Conservation vol: 43 first page: e02451 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02451
5. Pilot perceptions of options to manage drone-wildlife interactions; associations with wildlife value orientations and connectedness to nature
Elyce Gray, Michael A. Weston
Journal for Nature Conservation vol: 64 first page: 126090 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126090
6. Assessing sampling error associated with animal movements and distributions across drone monitoring strategies
Emma A. Schultz, Natasha Ellison-Neary, Landon R. Jones, Kristine O. Evans, Raymond B. Iglay
Ecological Modelling vol: 508 first page: 111235 year: 2025
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111235
7. Impact of Drone Disturbances on Wildlife: A Review
Saadia Afridi, Lucie Laporte-Devylder, Guy Maalouf, Jenna M. Kline, Samuel G. Penny, Kasper Hlebowicz, Dylan Cawthorne, Ulrik Pagh Schultz Lundquist
Drones vol: 9 issue: 4 first page: 311 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/drones9040311
8. Justice and ethics in conservation remote sensing: Current discourses and research needs
Natalie D.L. York, Rose Pritchard, Laura Aileen Sauls, Charis Enns, Timothy Foster
Biological Conservation vol: 287 first page: 110319 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110319
9. Elephants and algorithms: a review of the current and future role of AI in elephant monitoring
Leandra Brickson, Libby Zhang, Fritz Vollrath, Iain Douglas-Hamilton, Alexander J. Titus
Journal of The Royal Society Interface vol: 20 issue: 208 year: 2023
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0367
10. Modifying a mini drone for remote drug delivery for wildlife medicine
Marnoch Yindee, Patcharapol Khumngoen, Wallaya Manatchaiworakul, Tuempong Wongtawan
Drone Systems and Applications vol: 12 first page: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.1139/dsa-2024-0015