Short Communication

A new policy for the management of the Kruger National Park's elephant population

I.J. Whyte, H.C. Biggs, A. Gaylard, L.E.O. Braack
Koedoe | Vol 42, No 1 | a228 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v42i1.228 | © 1999 I.J. Whyte, H.C. Biggs, A. Gaylard, L.E.O. Braack | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 July 1999 | Published: 31 July 1999

About the author(s)

I.J. Whyte,, South Africa
H.C. Biggs,, South Africa
A. Gaylard, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
L.E.O. Braack,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (10MB)

Abstract

Arising from public debate held in Midrand on 4 May 1995, the South African National Parks undertook to review its policy for the management of elephant in the Kruger National Park. The new policy focuses on the extent and intensity of elephant impacts on biodiversity rather than on numbers of elephants per se, and is based on four fundamental principles: a) That ecosystems are not static; fluctuations of conditions and population responses are an inherent attribute of ecosystems and contribute to biodiversity. A range of elephant impacts in different areas at different times, is thus also natural and desirable; b) That elephants are important agents of habitat modification and thus contribute to biodiversity (intermediate disturbance hypothesis); c) That elephant populations which are confined will increase in number until negative impacts on the system's biodiversity will ultimately result; d) That elephants should not be viewed in isolation, but as one component of a broader, integrated system, and their impacts should be managed in conjunction with other ecosystem process (such as fire) to promote biodiversity in its broadest sense. The new policy proposes that the Kruger National Park be divided into six zones@two botanical reserves, two high-elephant-impact zones (no population reduction) and two low-elephant-impact zones (where numbers will be actively reduced). A history of the elephant population is given, and a resume of previous poli-cies.

Keywords

elephants, elephant management, culling, heterogeneity, biodiversity, Kruger National Park.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 9577
Total article views: 4283

 

Crossref Citations

1. Do browsing elephants damage female trees more?
Åsa M. Hemborg, William J. Bond
African Journal of Ecology  vol: 45  issue: 1  first page: 41  year: 2007  
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00666.x

2. Landscape‐scale sexual segregation in the dry season distribution and resource utilization of elephants in Kruger National Park, South Africa
I. P. J. Smit, C. C. Grant, I. J. Whyte
Diversity and Distributions  vol: 13  issue: 2  first page: 225  year: 2007  
doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00318.x

3. Baobabs and elephants in Kruger National Park: nowhere to hide
M. T. Edkins, L. M. Kruger, K. Harris, J. J. Midgley
African Journal of Ecology  vol: 46  issue: 2  first page: 119  year: 2008  
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00798.x

4. Ecological Thresholds in the Savanna Landscape: Developing a Protocol for Monitoring the Change in Composition and Utilisation of Large Trees
Dave J. Druce, Graeme Shannon, Bruce R. Page, Rina Grant, Rob Slotow, Sean Rands
PLoS ONE  vol: 3  issue: 12  first page: e3979  year: 2008  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003979

5. Megaparks for metapopulations: Addressing the causes of locally high elephant numbers in southern Africa
Rudi J. van Aarde, Tim P. Jackson
Biological Conservation  vol: 134  issue: 3  first page: 289  year: 2007  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.027

6. Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science – A retrospection: 1958 to 2018
Jane Carruthers, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science  vol: 61  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v61i1.1556

7. Management intervention affects river-bound spatial dynamics of elephants
Izak P.J. Smit, Sam M. Ferreira
Biological Conservation  vol: 143  issue: 9  first page: 2172  year: 2010  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.001

8. Response of Savanna Fire Regimes to Changing Fire‐Management Policies in a Large African National Park
B.W. VAN WILGEN, N. GOVENDER, H.C. BIGGS, D. NTSALA, X.N. FUNDA
Conservation Biology  vol: 18  issue: 6  first page: 1533  year: 2004  
doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00362.x

9. Large-scale impacts of herbivores on the structural diversity of African savannas
Gregory P. Asner, Shaun R. Levick, Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin, David E. Knapp, Ruth Emerson, James Jacobson, Matthew S. Colgan, Roberta E. Martin
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  vol: 106  issue: 12  first page: 4947  year: 2009  
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810637106

10. Science and Uncertainty in South Africa's Elephant Culling Debate
Paul Dickson, William M Adams
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy  vol: 27  issue: 1  first page: 110  year: 2009  
doi: 10.1068/c0792j

11. Change in Mesoherbivore Browsing Is Mediated by Elephant and Hillslope Position
D. D. Georgette Lagendijk, Maria Thaker, Willem F. de Boer, Bruce R. Page, Herbert H. T. Prins, Rob Slotow, Jin Chen
PLOS ONE  vol: 10  issue: 6  first page: e0128340  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128340

12. Aerial Survey Intensity as a Determinant of Estimates of African Elephant Population Sizes and Trends
Sam M. Ferreira, Rudi J. van Aarde
South African Journal of Wildlife Research  vol: 39  issue: 2  first page: 181  year: 2009  
doi: 10.3957/056.039.0205

13. Biologically relevant scales in large mammal management policies
Audrey Delsink, Abi T. Vanak, Sam Ferreira, Rob Slotow
Biological Conservation  vol: 167  first page: 116  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.035

14. Complexities associated with elephant impact on Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra in the Greater Kruger National Park
R.M. Cook, M.D. Henley
South African Journal of Botany  vol: 121  first page: 543  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.01.016

15. How many elephants can you fit into a conservation area
Simon Scheiter, Steven I. Higgins
Conservation Letters  vol: 5  issue: 3  first page: 176  year: 2012  
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00225.x

16. The impact of elephants on plants and their community variables in South Africa's Maputaland
Robert Guldemond, Rudi van Aarde
African Journal of Ecology  vol: 45  issue: 3  first page: 327  year: 2007  
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00714.x

17. Exploring an extensive dataset to establish woody vegetation cover and composition in Kruger National Park for the late 1980s
Gregory A. Kiker, Rheinhardt Scholtz, Izak P.J. Smit, Freek J. Venter
Koedoe  vol: 56  issue: 1  year: 2014  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v56i1.1200

18. Ecological impact of large herbivores on the woody vegetation at selected watering points on the eastern basaltic soils in the Kruger National Park
J. Brits, M. W. Van Rooyen, N. Van Rooyen
African Journal of Ecology  vol: 40  issue: 1  first page: 53  year: 2002  
doi: 10.1046/j.0141-6707.2001.00344.x

19. African elephantsLoxodonta africanaand human‐elephant interactions: implications for conservation
P. C. LEE, M. D. GRAHAM
International Zoo Yearbook  vol: 40  issue: 1  first page: 9  year: 2006  
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00009.x

20. Fecal 20-oxo-pregnane concentrations in free-ranging African elephants (Loxodonta africana) treated with porcine zona pellucida vaccine
M.J. Ahlers, A. Ganswindt, S. Münscher, H.J. Bertschinger
Theriogenology  vol: 78  issue: 1  first page: 77  year: 2012  
doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.01.023