Original Research

Mitochondrial DNA analysis of two southern African elephant populations

M.F. Essop, A.J. Hall-Martin, E.H. Harley
Koedoe | Vol 39, No 1 | a284 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v39i1.284 | © 1996 M.F. Essop, A.J. Hall-Martin, E.H. Harley | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 06 August 1996 | Published: 06 August 1996

About the author(s)

M.F. Essop, University of Cape Town Medical School, South Africa
A.J. Hall-Martin, National Parks Board, South Africa
E.H. Harley, University of Cape Town Medical School, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (1008KB)


The modern view is that there are at most only two valid forms of the African elephant namely Loxodonta qfricana africana, the bush elephant, and L.a. cyclotis, the forest elephant (Ansell 1974; Meester et al. 1986). The Knysna elephant which was also described as a separate sub-species is now almost extinct. Plans to augment the remnant population by introducing other animals must take into account the taxonomic questions and issue of conserving elephant gene pools (Greig 1982a). Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction fragment-size comparisons were performed on specimens from the Kruger National Park and the Addo Elephant National Park. If the Addo population's results are extrapolated to the Knysna population, it may be concluded that there is no genetic evidence for the Kruger and Knysna elephant populations to be considered as different sub-species.


Loxodonta, subspecies, mtDNA, Knysna, Kruger National Park, Addo Elephant National Park.


Total abstract views: 4301
Total article views: 2954


Crossref Citations

1. Post‐bottleneck genetic diversity of elephant populations in South Africa, revealed using microsatellite analysis
Anna M. Whitehouse, Eric H. Harley
Molecular Ecology  vol: 10  issue: 9  first page: 2139  year: 2001  
doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01356.x