Original Research

Landscape preference of the white rhinoceros in the central and northern Kruger National Park

D.J. Pienaar, J. du P. Bothma, G.K. Theron
Koedoe | Vol 36, No 1 | a364 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v36i1.364 | © 1993 National Parks Board
Submitted: 16 September 1993 | Published: 16 September 1993

About the author(s)

D.J. Pienaar, University of Pretoria, South Africa
J. du P. Bothma, University of Pretoria, South Africa
G.K. Theron, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (2MB)

Abstract

The long-term landscape preferences of the white rhinoceros for 32 different landscapes in the central and northern Kruger National Park are investigated. A preference index and a chi-square test are used to ascertain if white rhinoceroses prefer or avoid a particular landscape as habitat. Landscapes 13 (Karoo Sediment Plains with Acacia welwitschii Tree Savanna) and 11 (Slightly Undulating Granitoid Plains with Colophospermum mopane Bush Savanna), are the most preferred landscapes. Landscapes 23 (Basaltic Plains with Colophospermum mopane Shrub Savanna), 25 (Moderately Undulating Gabbroic Plains with Colophospermum mopane Shrub Savanna), 26 (Irregular Calsitic Plains with Colophospermum mopane Shrub Savanna), 28 (Alluvial Plains with Acacia albida Tree Savanna), 32 (Recent Sandy Plains with Baphia massaiensis Bush Savanna) and 33 (Slightly Undulating Andesitic Plains with Comhretum collinum Shrub Savanna) appear to be avoided. Characterestics of the preferred landscapes are: moderate to dense grass cover with good quality grasses; open to moderate low-shrub (<2 m) stratum; a moderate tree stratum; an undulating topography with uplands, bottomlands and watercourses; sandy soils with few stones and rocks on the soil surface; permanent water sources.

Keywords

Ceratotherium simum simum, white rhinoceros, landscape preference, habitat preference, tree savanna, shrub savanna.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5950
Total article views: 3559

 

Crossref Citations

1. An expert-driven causal model of the rhino poaching problem
Hildegarde Koen, J.P. de Villiers, Henk Roodt, Alta de Waal
Ecological Modelling  vol: 347  first page: 29  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.12.007

2. Contact Calls of the Northern and Southern White Rhinoceros Allow for Individual and Species Identification
Ivana Cinková, Richard Policht, Nicolas Mathevon
PLoS ONE  vol: 9  issue: 6  first page: e98475  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098475

3. Restoration of a megaherbivore: landscape‐level impacts of white rhinoceros in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt, Mariska te Beest, Peter Bellingham
Journal of Ecology  vol: 102  issue: 3  first page: 566  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12218

4. Poaching is directly and indirectly driving the decline of South Africa's large population of white rhinos
Zoliswa N. Nhleko, Robert Ahrens, Sam M. Ferreira, Robert A. McCleery
Animal Conservation  vol: 25  issue: 2  first page: 151  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1111/acv.12720

5. Range Analysis and Terrain Preference of Adult Southern White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) in a South African Private Game Reserve: Insights into Carrying Capacity and Future Management
S. Thompson, T. Avent, L. S. Doughty, Mathew S. Crowther
PLOS ONE  vol: 11  issue: 9  first page: e0161724  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161724