Essay

How assessment and reflection relate to more effective learning in adaptive management

Harry Biggs, Charles Breen, Rob Slotow, Stefanie Freitag, Marc Hockings
Koedoe | Vol 53, No 2 | a1001 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1001 | © 2011 Harry Biggs, Charles Breen, Rob Slotow, Stefanie Freitag, Marc Hockings | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 May 2010 | Published: 11 May 2011

About the author(s)

Harry Biggs, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa
Charles Breen, Centre for Environment, Agriculture and Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Rob Slotow, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Stefanie Freitag, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa
Marc Hockings, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Assessment (an immediate evaluation of significance or performance) and reflection (a lengthy, deep consideration) should be important components of adaptive management leading to learning. In this paper we use a prototype adaptive cycle and feedback framework, which are related to some aspects of learning theory, to examine the extent to which assessment and reflection were applied in a series of studies and initiatives in the Kruger National Park. In addition to evaluating assessment and reflection, we also considered how the various contributing components of each case were inter-related to provide a holistic view of each initiative.

Two other studies in the Kruger National Park, which have examined learning specifically, are also discussed. One of them suggests that in a complex environment, learning necessarily has a dual nature, with each component of seven contrasting pairs of the aspects of learning in partial tension with the other. We use these dualities to further probe assessment, reflection, inter-relatedness and learning in the cases presented. Each contrasting aspect of a ‘learning duality’ turns out to emphasise either assessment or reflection, which reinforces the idea that both are needed to facilitate sufficient learning for successful adaptive management. We hope this analysis can act as a springboard for further study, practice and reflection on these important and often underrated components of adaptive management.

Conservation implications: The better understanding of assessment and reflection as being largely separate but complementary actions will assist adaptive management practitioners to give explicit attention to both, and to relate them better to each other.


Keywords

strategic adaptive management, learning organisation, feedbacks

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8090
Total article views: 20790

 

Crossref Citations

1. A combination of active learning strategies improves student academic outcomes in first-year paramedic bioscience
Puspha Sinnayah, Joseph A. Rathner, Daniel Loton, Rudi Klein, Peter Hartley
Advances in Physiology Education  vol: 43  issue: 2  first page: 233  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1152/advan.00199.2018

2. Stakeholder Participation in Freshwater Monitoring and Evaluation Programs: Applying Thresholds of Potential Concern within Environmental Flows
John Conallin, Craig A. McLoughlin, Josh Campbell, Roger Knight, Troy Bright, Ian Fisher
Environmental Management  vol: 61  issue: 3  first page: 408  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0940-2

3. Coordinated action across administration levels and assessments: key tools to reveal barriers to effective management of protected areas
Marcos Eugenio Maes, Eduardo Luis Hettwer Giehl, Natalia Hanazaki
Parks  vol: 30  issue: 1  first page: 67  year: 2024  
doi: 10.2305/TUUF3010

4. Adaptive Management of Malkumba-Coongie Lakes Ramsar Site in Arid Australia—A Free Flowing River and Wetland System
Richard T. Kingsford, Craig A. McLoughlin, Robert Brandle, Gilad Bino, Bernie Cockayne, David Schmarr, Travis Gotch, Vol Norris, Justin McCann
Sustainability  vol: 13  issue: 6  first page: 3043  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/su13063043

5. Facilitating the Development and Evaluation of a Citizen Science Web site: A Case Study of Repeat Photography and Climate Change in Southwest Alaska's National Parks
Karina C. Mullen, Gregory Newman, Jessica L. Thompson
Applied Environmental Education & Communication  vol: 12  issue: 4  first page: 261  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2013.876302

6. Implementation of Environmental Flows for Intermittent River Systems: Adaptive Management and Stakeholder Participation Facilitate Implementation
John Conallin, Emma Wilson, Josh Campbell
Environmental Management  vol: 61  issue: 3  first page: 497  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0922-4

7. Purposeful Stakeholder Engagement for Improved Environmental Flow Outcomes
Meghan L. Mussehl, Avril C. Horne, J. Angus Webb, N. LeRoy Poff
Frontiers in Environmental Science  vol: 9  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.749864

8. Adaptive and transformative learning in environmental water management: Implementing the Crocodile River’s Ecological Reserve in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Craig A. McLoughlin, Eddie S. Riddell, Robin M. Petersen, Jacques Venter
KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science  vol: 63  issue: 1  year: 2021  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v63i1.1663

9. The development and application of strategic adaptive management within South African National Parks
Dirk J. Roux, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1049

10. Facilitating Urban Sustainability through Transdisciplinary (TD) Research: Lessons from Ghana, South Africa, and Zimbabwe
Gladman Thondhlana, Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya, Alice McClure, Akosua Baah Kwarteng Amaka-Otchere, Sheunesu Ruwanza
Sustainability  vol: 13  issue: 11  first page: 6205  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3390/su13116205

11. How much does participatory flood management contribute to stakeholders' social capacity building? Empirical findings based on a triangulation of three evaluation approaches
M. Buchecker, S. Menzel, R. Home
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences  vol: 13  issue: 6  first page: 1427  year: 2013  
doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-1427-2013

12. A heuristic framework for reflecting on protected areas and their stewardship in the 21st century
Stephen F. McCool, Bimo Nkhata, Charles Breen, Wayne A. Freimund
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism  vol: 1-2  first page: 9  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2013.03.002

13. Adaptive management in restoration initiatives: Lessons learned from some of South Africa's projects
Hloniphani Moyo, Rob Slotow, Mathieu Rouget, Lutendo Mugwedi, Errol Douwes, Zivanayi Tsvuura, Thulani Tshabalala
South African Journal of Botany  vol: 139  first page: 352  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.03.016

14. Taking stock after a decade: Does the ‘thresholds of potential concern’ concept need a socio-ecological revamp?
Harry Biggs, Sam Ferreira, Stefanie Freitag-Ronaldson, Rina Grant-Biggs
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1002

15. Strategic Adaptive Management for Transparency, Accountability and Learning: Insights from More Than a Quarter Century of Practice
Dirk J. Roux, Richard T. Kingsford, Jessica Cockburn
Environmental Management  vol: 75  issue: 10  first page: 2521  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02272-5

16. Learning consciousness in managing water for the environment, exemplified using Macquarie River and Marshes, Australia
Craig A. McLoughlin, Richard T. Kingsford, William Johnson, Paul Frazier
Marine and Freshwater Research  vol: 75  issue: 12  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1071/MF24049

17. The ongoing development of a pragmatic and adaptive fire management policy in a large African savanna protected area
Brian W. van Wilgen, Navashni Govender, Izak P.J. Smit, Sandra MacFadyen
Journal of Environmental Management  vol: 132  first page: 358  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.003

18. Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Management Effectiveness
Lauren Coad, Fiona Leverington, Kathryn Knights, Jonas Geldmann, April Eassom, Valerie Kapos, Naomi Kingston, Marcelo de Lima, Camilo Zamora, Ivon Cuardros, Christoph Nolte, Neil D. Burgess, Marc Hockings
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences  vol: 370  issue: 1681  first page: 20140281  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0281

19. Using Strategic Adaptive Management to Facilitate Implementation of Environmental Flow Programs in Complex Social-Ecological Systems
John Conallin, Josh Campbell, Lee Baumgartner
Environmental Management  vol: 62  issue: 5  first page: 955  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1091-9

20. Appraising strategic adaptive management as a process of organizational learning
Dirk J. Roux, Peter Novellie, Izak P.J. Smit, Joop de Kraker, Samantha Mc Culloch-Jones, Luthando E. Dziba, Stefanie Freitag, Danie J. Pienaar
Journal of Environmental Management  vol: 301  first page: 113920  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113920

21. Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System
Jessica Cockburn, Carolyn (Tally) G. Palmer, Harry Biggs, Eureta Rosenberg
Land  vol: 7  issue: 4  first page: 129  year: 2018  
doi: 10.3390/land7040129

22. Research, monitoring, and reflection as a guide to the management of complex ecosystems: The case of fire in the Kruger National Park, South Africa
Brian W. van Wilgen, Tercia Strydom, Chenay Simms, Izak P. J. Smit
Conservation Science and Practice  vol: 4  issue: 4  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1111/csp2.12658