Original Research

Changing distributions of larger ungulates in the Kruger National Park from ecological aerial survey data

George J. Chirima, Norman Owen-Smith, Barend F.N. Erasmus
Koedoe | Vol 54, No 1 | a1009 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v54i1.1009 | © 2012 George J. Chirima, Norman Owen-Smith, Barend F.N. Erasmus | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 08 June 2010 | Published: 24 July 2012

About the author(s)

George J. Chirima, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Norman Owen-Smith, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Barend F.N. Erasmus, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Abstract

Documenting current species distribution patterns and their association with habitat types is important as a basis for assessing future range shifts in response to climate change or other influences. We used the adaptive local convex hull (a-LoCoH) method to map distribution ranges of 12 ungulate species within the Kruger National Park (KNP) based on locations recorded during aerial surveys (1980–1993). We used log-linear models to identify changes in regional distribution patterns and chi-square tests to determine shifts in habitat occupation over this period. We compared observed patterns with earlier, more subjectively derived distribution maps for these species. Zebra, wildebeest and giraffe distributions shifted towards the far northern section of the KNP, whilst buffalo and kudu showed proportional declines in the north. Sable antelope distribution contracted most in the north, whilst tsessebe, eland and roan antelope distributions showed no shifts. Warthog and waterbuck contracted in the central and northern regions, respectively. The distribution of impala did not change. Compared with earlier distributions, impala, zebra, buffalo, warthog and waterbuck had become less strongly concentrated along rivers. Wildebeest, zebra, sable antelope and tsessebe had become less prevalent in localities west of the central region. Concerning habitat occupation, the majority of grazers showed a concentration on basaltic substrates, whilst sable antelope favoured mopane-dominated woodland and sour bushveld on granite. Buffalo showed no strong preference for any habitats and waterbuck were concentrated along rivers. Although widespread, impala were absent from sections of mopane shrubveld and sandveld. Kudu and giraffe were widespread through most habitats, but with a lesser prevalence in northern mopane-dominated habitats. Documented distribution shifts appeared to be related to the completion of the western boundary fence and widened provision of surface water within the park.

Conservation implications: The objectively recorded distribution patterns provide a foundation for assessing future changes in distribution that may take place in response to climatic shifts or other influences.


Keywords

animal prevalence; climate change; landscape preference; range expansion; waterpoints

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8259
Total article views: 23722

 

Crossref Citations

1. Are relatively rare antelope narrowly selective feeders? A sable antelope and zebra comparison
N. Owen‐Smith, E. Le Roux, V. Macandza
Journal of Zoology  vol: 291  issue: 3  first page: 163  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1111/jzo.12058

2. Habitat differences do not explain population declines of sable antelope in an African savanna
G. P. Asner, N. Owen‐Smith, S. R. Loarie, A. B. Davies, E. Le Roux, S. R. Levick
Journal of Zoology  vol: 297  issue: 3  first page: 225  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1111/jzo.12269

3. Errors in aerial survey count data: Identifying pitfalls and solutions
Kayla L. Davis, Emily D. Silverman, Allison L. Sussman, R. Randy Wilson, Elise F. Zipkin
Ecology and Evolution  vol: 12  issue: 3  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1002/ece3.8733

4. Behaviour-Related Scalar Habitat Use by Cape Buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer)
Emily Bennitt, Mpaphi Casper Bonyongo, Stephen Harris, Sadie Jane Ryan
PLOS ONE  vol: 10  issue: 12  first page: e0145145  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145145

5. Comparison of Kernel Density and Local Convex Hull Methods for Assessing Distribution Ranges of Large Mammalian Herbivores
George J Chirima, Norman Owen‐Smith
Transactions in GIS  vol: 21  issue: 2  first page: 359  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1111/tgis.12193

6. Quantifying spatiotemporal drivers of environmental heterogeneity in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Sandra MacFadyen, Cang Hui, Peter H. Verburg, Astrid J. A. Van Teeffelen
Landscape Ecology  vol: 31  issue: 9  first page: 2013  year: 2016  
doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0378-6

7. Spatial ecology of large herbivore populations
Norman Owen‐Smith
Ecography  vol: 37  issue: 5  first page: 416  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00613.x

8. All in the Details: A First Assessment for the Viability of Metabarcoding in Diet Composition Analysis of African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus)
Bridget C. O'Connor, Bruce Crossey, Grant Hall, Andre Ganswindt, Carel J. Oosthuizen
Ecology and Evolution  vol: 14  issue: 11  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1002/ece3.70526